Late last week, I pointed out that Andrew Sullivan had made a fairly significant error in his supposedly damning post on Josh Marshall's recent New Yorker essay, "Power Rangers." And now that Sullivan has acknowledged the error while loudly protesting that it didn't really matter, it's awfully tempting to write a follow-up explaining all the reasons why, in fact, it did. Unfortunately, I can't figure out a way do that without sounding every bit as churlish as Mr. Sullivan does in his non-correction correction, so I guess I'll just have to link and move on.
POSTSCRIPT: In case you missed it, check out Ted Barlow's post on this subject; Andrew's e-mail reply, which Ted published in full as an update, is particularly worthy of note. As is Ted's gap-jawed disbelief, which I tend to share.
Posted by Jack O'Toole on February 1, 2004 06:12 AMThe saddest thing is that it's not even Andrew's least classy correction after misrepresenting a liberal. The most classless apology that I've ever read from a major pundit is preserved here (unfortunately a Free Republic link) after Andrew accused David Brock of lying.
The David Brock thing was an honest mistake, but the correction was not.
Posted by: Ted Barlow on February 2, 2004 12:27 PMWhoops, no link. Here it is: http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/673990/posts
Posted by: Ted Barlow on February 2, 2004 12:30 PM