Just what is it about John Edwards that scares Matt Drudge so much?
Yesterday, he was accusing Edwards of ... supporting Bill Clinton's position on Social Security! And today, he argues that by spending more than $729,600 in NH, Edwards has by definition violated the state's FEC spending caps -- a silly charge that's directly contradicted by this LA Times article.
C'mon, Matt -- there's just no there there. Time to move on, big fella.
Posted by Jack O'Toole on January 23, 2004 09:08 AM